4 · Here is how it compares
Comparison workspace
Published specifications transcribed from the supplied Tafel presentation, with its source references. Competitor cells have not been independently retested.
Select up to 3 cells to compare with TLCC (0/3 selected)
| Cell | Capacity | Continuous rating | Cycle result | Discharge / charge | Retention metric | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLCC 21700Tafel | 4.0 Ah | 40 A⚠ Operating-condition clarification pending (source states both “no derating” and a 75°C cutoff). | 600 cycles | 40 A / 8 A | 50% energy |
Reading cycle results
TLCC reports energy retention; other makers report capacity retention. These are different metrics, and test currents differ, so cycle counts are not ranked against each other. Ampace JP40 (†) is retailer-sourced, not a manufacturer datasheet.
Published tests help shortlist a cell. Your duty cycle decides the design-in.
Evaluate TLCC against your current cell5 · What your evaluation can establish
Bring your duty cycle
No simulations — just what published data answers, and what only your testing can.
Evaluation discussion summary
Fill in what you know. We’ll list what published data can answer and what your evaluation should establish.